The five pillars of the prior piece were: (1) net interest income stabilising as the bank charter matured, (2) financial services revenue crossing inflection, (3) tech platform (Galileo/Technisys) becoming a margin contributor, (4) credit quality holding through the 2024 normalisation cycle, and (5) the valuation gap to traditional banks tightening as the fintech discount faded.
Let us audit each.
Net interest income stabilisation: confirmed. Net interest margin expanded from the low side of 5.5% to roughly 6.0% over the 2025 year as deposit costs re-priced faster than loan yields. The deposit base itself grew from approximately $25 billion to over $30 billion, a 20%-plus growth rate that beats the industry average by a wide margin.
Financial services inflection: confirmed. Contribution profit from the financial services segment crossed into a materially positive range, with unit economics per active member improving every quarter through 2025. This was the single most scrutinised segment by bears and the one where the thesis required execution rather than macro.
Tech platform: partial confirmation. Galileo revenue grew but at a slower pace than we modelled, roughly 8% YoY rather than the 15% we had scoped. The segment remains a contribution-margin positive but its weight in the overall story is less than projected.
Credit quality: confirmed. Net charge-off rates on the personal loan book remained within the 3.5-4.2% corridor we forecast. The vintage quality of 2023-2024 personal loan origination, which had been the bear case, came in consistent with historical loss curves.
Valuation re-rating: partial. The market paid for the thesis in mid-2025 when the stock ran toward $30, then gave it back through late 2025 as macro concerns about consumer credit broadly weighed on the name. The discount to traditional bank multiples has narrowed but not closed.
Four of five pillars fully confirmed. One partially. That is a successful thesis execution by any reasonable standard.